UFO are you afraid of them?

Nothing has emerged from the study of UFO the last 40 years

I started to read books on the eyes and unexplained phenomena at the age of 14 years.

UFO is an unidentified Flying object which is recognized as a possible or actual alien ship. These objects include meteor, putrescent satellites, flocks of birds, aircraft lights, weather balloons, and global lightning generally anything moving within the visible electromagnetic spectrum. Until now, however, nothing has been identified in a manner that requires common sense and science as alien ship. That is, they are identical repeated experiences UFO tangible and material evidence to suggest the passage or landing a UFO.

There are so many photos of UFOs those that exist for the monster of Loch Ness, and is of the same quality: blurry and forged. Other physical evidence, such as alleged debris from shattered vessels, burnt marks on the ground due to UFO landings, or implants in the brain or noses of people who have been abducted by aliens, eventually proved to be very earthy, many from which fraud. The main reasons to believe in UFO is the testimony of many people, the inability to distinguish science from science fiction, our willingness to believe people who say incompetent fantastic stories, the ability to look with suspicion all contrary sources as part of a satanic conspiracy to hide the truth and our desire to come into contact with the outside of the Earth. The belief in aliens and A.T.I.A. similar to the belief in supernatural beings.

"The UFOlogy is the mythology of the era of space. ... Instead of angels
... now we have aliens. It is a product of creative imagination. Serves
a poetic and existential purpose. It looks to give the man
deeper roots and directions in the universe. It is an expression of our thirst
for mystery ... our hope for a transcendental meaning. The Gods of Olympus
metaschimatisthikan in space travelers, carrying us through
our dreams to other worlds. "- Paul Kurtz

Dr. J. Allen Hynek, astronomer, prominent supporter of UFO and the man who coined the term "close contact third type provides a UFO. as,

The reported perception of an object or light in the sky or on Earth,
whose appearance, trajectory and general dynamic behavior and luminous,
does not represent a logical, conventional explanation, and that (perception) not only
causing confusion to the witnesses, but remains non-identifiable after
scrutiny of all available evidence by persons who are
technically capable to make an identification based on common sense, if this is possible.

These words seem weird to think that when you see something that intelligent people can not explain logically, then what you see is a A.T.I.A. . Witnesses such Popular often argue that what we saw can not be explained by the known laws of physics. Views claim that a violation of the laws of nature, a miracle.

This Hynek considers that "all available evidence" may be sufficiently far less would require a skeptic. For example, evidence showing the UFOlogoi consisting of (1) the testimony of people who claim to have seen aliens and / or alien vessels, (2) information on the type of people who give such testimony, (3) the absence of conflicting testimony or tangible evidence that would either explain the Popular with conventional interpretations (weather balloons, hoaxes, meteoriton rain, reflections, lights, etc.) will either reduce the credibility of witnesses, and (4) alleged weaknesses of the arguments made by skeptics against to UFOlogous. The latter is irrelevant, and yet play a disproportionate role in UFOlogia.

The arguments to attack the motives or an opponent, rather than positive evidence to defend their own claims, is a common mistake among those who argue on the UFO and alien. Of course, there is nothing wrong to attack the opponent's arguments and reveals the weaknesses and the errors. But the defense is not a substitute for support. It is simply false logic to assume that because the argument of our opponent is lanthasameno, then ours is right. Can the two be on 'equal wrong.

Another common practice of UFOlogon is to argue that the skeptics can not prove that they were alien craft. Hence, one supposed to conclude that what was actually idothike alien ship. Such reasoning is called argumentum ad ignorantiam (argument from ignorance). A claim is not true or reasonable if the claim was not contrary can be proven true. With claims for A.T.I.A. There are two different tactics here. The first is to pretend that there is no logical explanation as a scientist, pilot, Air Force lieutenant general, or a doctor can not imagine one. The other is to point out the lack of conflicting data, there is no contrary testimony witnesses, no evidence that they were aliens or alien craft. And here is a logical error. The fact that a genius can not think an explanation is irrelevant to the 't decide whether the correct explanation includes visitors from space.

UFO and paranormal phenomena

UFO are you afraid of them?

Nothing has emerged from the study of UFO the last 40 years